eeg & meg theory: eeg meg comparison

Scalp topography and magnetic field are oriented perpendicularly:


EEG
MEG
Potential / Magnetfeld
Topographie


L2 – Minimum Norm





Radial sources do not generate a measurable magnetic field:

EEG
MEG
Potential / Magnetfeld
Topographie

L2 – Minimum Norm





The EEG Reference Dependency:





Inverse Methods are reference independant:


EEG Average Reference
EEG Linked Ears Reference
Potential Topographie
L2 – Minimum Norm





EEG
MEG
Measures surface potentials of extracellular currents generated by synchronous excitatory postsynaptic potentials at apical dendrites of
several thousands of adjacent and similarly oriented pyramidal cells.
Measures external magnetic fields of intracellular currents generated by synchronous excitatory postsynaptic potentials at apical dendrites of several thousands of adjacent and similarly oriented pyramidal cells.
Measures radial and tangential sources
Measures mainly (90%) tangential sources
Is reference dependent
Is reference independent
Inverse solutions, CSD, Average Reference are reference independent (not uncritical)
Is reference independent
Scalp potentials do strongly depend on volume conductor properties. The inverse solutions do strongly depend on the correct modeling of such properties.
External magnetic fields depend to a smaller degree on volume conductor properties. The inverse solutions do thus lesser depend on the correct modeling of such properties.
Independent of sensor orientation
Dependent on sensor orientation
In first approximation independent of sensor positioning (standard positions). For better approximation measurement of head shape and sensor coordinates necessary.
Always dependent on sensor configuration (no standard positions) => Measurement of head shape and sensor coordinates always necessary.
Group level statistical analysis possible in sensor domain (in first approximation )
Group level statistical analysis not possible in sensor domain (normalization on standard sensor system necessary )
Smaller impact of movements (electrode positions stay identical, noise increases).
Strong influence of movements (correction not yet possible).
Strong superposition of multiple generators even if far away from each other.
Smaller superposition of multiple generators.
Stronger impact of ocular artifacts, lesser impact of cardiac artifacts
Stronger impact of cardiac artifacts, lesser impact of ocular artifacts
Smaller temporal stability due to changing impedancies
High temporal stability
Smaller impact of environmental noise (shielding chamber beneficial but not necessary)
Strong impact of environmental noise (shielding chamber necessary)
Small attenuation of deep sources
Stronger attenuation of deep sources, especially in gradiometer systems with small baseline
High dimensionality of the source space (radial & tangential, superficial & deep sources) => High ambiguity of the inverse solution
Smaller dimensionality of the source space (no radial, no deep sources) => Smaller ambiguity of the inverse solution
Smaller localization accuracy on single subject level due to volume conductor dependencies.
Higher localization accuracy on single subject level. On group level advantageous if based on big N. (structural and functional intersubject variance asks for smoothing).
Small head size dependency
Stronger head size dependency. Smaller heads show worse S/N.
up to 256 sensors
up to 275 sensors
Medium investment and medium operating costs
High investment and high operating costs